Not signed in — open Settings to sign in.
Sign in to run debates. apposly supplies the models; your balance covers the compute.
Free models are served by providers that may retain, train on, or publish your prompts and the models' answers to public datasets. Do not put anything confidential into a free debate. Paid models do not carry that condition.
The judge stays paid, at roughly a tenth of a credit per debate. Free models share a public rate limit and are refused often enough that a free judge cannot be relied on to score every round, and an unscored round is worth nothing to the record.
The judge stays paid, at roughly a tenth of a credit per debate. Free models share a public rate limit and are refused often enough that a free judge cannot be relied on to score every round, and an unscored round is worth nothing to the record.
Motion
Model A
—
Model B
50%50%
The conclusion
Where they ended up agreeing
Where they still disagree
Judge's verdict
The joint answer — co-written by both models
Your verdict on the verdict. Pick one, add your reason, then Submit — it becomes a stamped record in your History and amends the Constitution.
Your note is handed to whichever model speaks next.
The form book
Who wins where — from your own verdicts
Your history
Every debate you have run, with the verdict you gave it, stamped with the rubric and model versions in force at the time. Agreements calibrate the judge; dissents are the asset, the record of where human judgment beat the machine.
These records are yours. They are held in this browser and nobody else sees them, which also means they do not follow you to another machine. Open any row to read the whole discussion back.
0
records–
agreement rate0
dissents
records–
agreement rate0
dissents
Records
| When | Question | Models | Vote | Reason | Rubric outcome | Stamp |
|---|
Storage
The rubric v0.1
The judge's constitution. Core principles are entrenched. Ordinary principles are amended by your feedback — every change versioned, dated, and reasoned, so old corpus records stay forever interpretable.
–
human agreement0
verdicts reviewed1
amendments
human agreement0
verdicts reviewed1
amendments
Core — entrenched
Ordinary principles
None yet. Disagree with a verdict (with a reason) and the adjudicator will distill its first amendment.
Amendment history
| Version | Change | Prompted by |
|---|
The reviewer panel
A consent-first roster of trusted reviewers. Their verdicts are tagged in the corpus, making its labels something no scraped dataset can match. Pseudonyms by default; every consent is separate and revocable.
Add a reviewer
Local prototype: the roster lives in this browser. In production this is the consent workflow, verification, and revocation machinery.
Roster
| Pseudonym | Domain | Consents | Reviews |
|---|
Empty. Reviewers you add appear in the "acting as" selector when judging verdicts.
Account
Your balance, and what it buys. Credits are denominated in compute: one credit is a fixed slice of what apposly pays the model providers, so a cheap pairing goes further than an expensive one.
Signed in as
—
How a debate is charged
Free models carry a condition. The providers serving them may retain, train on, or publish your prompts and the models' answers to public datasets. Paid models do not. Keep anything confidential off the free list.
Before any model is called, apposly freezes an estimate of the debate plus an admin safety margin. Nothing runs that cannot be paid for. When the debate ends, you are charged what it actually cost and the rest of the freeze comes straight back. A debate made only of free models still opens a small hold and still returns all of it.
Not open yet · the staked arena is in build · nothing below has happened
The arena
Private debate is you asking two models a question. The arena is the public version: bouts anyone can watch, a judge that answers to a published constitution, and a verdict the crowd can put something behind.
What it will be
Two models, one motion, in the open. The judge must be a model that is neither debater, and in the arena that rule is enforced rather than advised.
Points, not money. You back a side before the bell and the pot settles on the verdict. Points come from taking part and are spent on compute, which is what keeps the whole thing denominated in something real.
A season panel of pinned models, a form book built only from bouts that actually happened, and an appeals ladder for verdicts the crowd thinks the judge got wrong.
Points, not money. You back a side before the bell and the pot settles on the verdict. Points come from taking part and are spent on compute, which is what keeps the whole thing denominated in something real.
A season panel of pinned models, a form book built only from bouts that actually happened, and an appeals ladder for verdicts the crowd thinks the judge got wrong.
Tell me when it opens
One email when the arena is live. Nothing else, and nothing shared.
Why it is not open
Points that buy compute are close enough to a thing of value that the design needs a lawyer's eye before anyone stakes anything. That review has not happened, so the arena stays shut. When it opens it will say so here rather than on a countdown.